The End?

- I'm really sorry, man. I can't stand it anymore, I can't stand the pain. I have to leave... it's very difficult and hard for me to do this, but all this time I have been dealing with this pain which has almost brought me to my knees, and you mean so much to me. I don't want to hurt you...
- Yeah, though I bet banging your other friends during the times you were trying to stay away was enjoyable, too.
- How dare you speak of such bullshit?!
- How dare I?! Because it's true!
- Why are you being such an asshole?
- You goddamn cunt didn't leave me any other choice now, did you?
- I thought we could both act like adults...
- So did I. You disappointed me.
- You will always have a place in my heart.
- That's quite unfortunate, I'd have to say. I wish it weren't so. Anyway, get the fuck out of here. I don't really wanna see you around here anymore.
- This is very unfair!
- I'm glad to hear that. Mission accomplished! Now out, cunt!

F. FIRE


Now Playing: Rammstein - Spring

Modelling...

Our lives go through phases, time periods of finite length, in which the general state of our mind, the general way we feel, are dominated by one or more states or ways, which are themselves the outputs reached by the analysis of the external, or internal, factors which have been received by the brain, and are affecting our lives.
Since some of these processes are started, affected and completed, by our actions, the decisions we make, they can be considered iterating systems.

It should be fairly convenient to assume that this concept is possible to be modelled by a dynamic system which may include feedback and iterating loops.

The Conflict, Part I

People with a religious mind frame still suffer from the naive, lazy, and ancient misconception that: "the universe looks and feels extremely complex and accurately harmonized. Therefore, it cannot be explained and understood by the human mind, and a higher, more intelligent being should be in charge."
As if they have not been informed about the scientific discoveries of the past few centuries. Some could be excused considering that they have not had access to sources of information. But what can be said about the rest of them?

There are a few groups among these of people:
The conservative activists. They have a solid position regarding this matter, believe in creationism, and are usually unable to back it up by invalidating evolution in a proper manner.
The confused, and ordinary, pacificists. They probably wouldn't care either way, their lives doesn't depend on it (and yet it does), have not much scientifical knowledge regarding the subject, and basically do not care to familiarize themselves with the concept.
The confused, and intellectual, activists. They admit that the change exists, they believe in evolution, and yet, they believe the universe requires a designing brain of supreme intellectual power while they agree that many events and processes are jump-started by very simple and basic actions and reactions.

How can men of science, logic and rationality overlook such obvious paradox, make an irrational assumption, and proceed to prove something using the false assumption?